Another alarming headline to drive the clicks. The context makes it more complicated. And for anyone who has planned carefully for early retirement, the research contains something genuinely useful alongside the anxiety-inducing number.
4 min read
Scottish Widows published its annual National Retirement Forecast (NRF) this week, and the number leading the coverage is striking. Around 12.2 million adults across the UK are at risk of being unable to cover their basic financial needs in retirement. [Scottish Widows]
That's a large number and a genuine concern. It's also not the whole story - and the parts of the story that most of the coverage is leaving out are worth examining.
What the research actually shows
The Scottish Widows forecast projects retirement outcomes for people aged 22 to 65 based on their savings, behaviours and income sources, comparing expected income to potential living and housing costs in retirement, based on a survey of around 6,000 people. [Scottish Widows]
It uses the PLSA retirement living standards as its benchmark - the minimum standard currently set at £13,400 per year for a single person.
The first thing worth noting is that the report did indicate an improvement compared with last year, when 15.3 million people were thought not to be on track for even the minimum needed in retirement. [Scottish Widows] Three million people moved from the at-risk category to a more adequate position in a single year. That improvement is real and significant, but it barely features in any of the coverage.
The improvement was partly driven by people who don't save into a pension seeing improvements elsewhere, such as through slightly higher pay, increased non-pension savings or levels of home-ownership. [Scottish Widows] Which leads to the second thing worth noting: the research's own authors acknowledge that pensions alone don't determine retirement outcomes. Housing equity, ISA savings, part-time income and other assets all contribute to the picture.
This is directly relevant to the FreeBefore65 approach to planning. The bridge years strategy, the ISA as a primary income source during the gap years, the mortgage-free position as a foundation - these are exactly the non-pension factors the research acknowledges as improving retirement outcomes.
The source - worth naming
Scottish Widows is one of the UK's largest pension providers. This context doesn't invalidate the research - the methodology is transparent and the data is drawn from a substantial YouGov survey. But research showing millions aren't saving enough into pensions is published by an organisation that directly benefits from people saving more into pensions. The commercial interest and the public interest point in the same direction here, which makes the research both more widely shared and worth reading with clear eyes.
The recommendation that the statutory level of saving into workplace pensions through automatic enrolment should increase from 8% to 12% is a policy position that would materially benefit Scottish Widows and its competitors. It may also be the right policy. Both things can be true simultaneously.
What it means for people planning early retirement
For someone who has spent eighteen months stress-testing a retirement plan, the 12.2 million figure can land as either reassuring or alarming depending on how you read it.
Reassuring: if you've done the planning work covered throughout this site, run the scenarios, built the ISA bridge, paid off the mortgage and know your enough number, you are already operating in a completely different position from the people this research is describing. The at-risk population is primarily people who haven't planned, haven't saved adequately, or are facing structural financial barriers - renters with no housing equity, self-employed workers without auto-enrolment, low earners whose wages leave nothing for pensions.
Alarming - or at least worth noting: the research flags that energy costs pushing back up could quickly reverse the improvement seen this year. The 12.2 million figure is a snapshot. It can move in either direction. And the people most at risk are those most exposed to external events they cannot control.
For early retirees specifically, the research reinforces something already covered on this site. The pension alone is rarely sufficient. Most people are unlikely to have enough in their pension pots alone to fund their desired retirement, so pensions can no longer be viewed in isolation. Considering pensions alongside other savings, investments and housing wealth will be key to improving retirement outcomes. The multi-layer approach - pension, ISA, property equity, State Pension - is not a niche early retirement strategy. It's what the research itself is pointing towards as the model for adequate retirement outcomes.
The groups most at risk - and why it matters
People who identify as LGBTQ+, people with disabilities and people from black communities are particularly likely not to be on track for a minimum lifestyle in retirement. Part-time and self-employed workers are more likely to face worse retirement outcomes than full-time workers. [MoneyWeek]
The proportion of people estimated to be on track to have at least a minimum lifestyle in retirement ranged from just over half in both Northern Ireland and the North East of England to more than two-thirds in the East of England. [MoneyWeek]
These disparities matter for two reasons. First, because they're real and significant and deserve naming rather than being buried in a general population figure. Second, because they're a reminder that the "normal people can retire early" argument this site makes has limits. For someone renting in the North East on a part-time income, the structural barriers to adequate retirement are considerably higher than for a mortgage-free homeowner with a workplace pension.
The FreeBefore65 illustrations section covers some of this territory - the low pot route, the single parent, the carer - but it's worth acknowledging directly that the planning framework works better for some starting positions than others.
The practical takeaway
If you're reading this site you're almost certainly not in the 12.2 million. The act of planning seriously for early retirement puts you in a different category from the population this research is describing.
But the research is a useful prompt for two things.
First: check the multi-layer picture rather than the pension in isolation. If your retirement income picture is primarily pension-dependent, the research's own conclusion - that housing wealth, savings and other assets need to be considered alongside the pension - is worth taking seriously. The Bridge Years post and the Draw-down Strategy post cover exactly this.
Second: if you have family members or friends who aren't planning at all, the Scottish Widows research is a useful conversation starter. The free Pension Wise appointments at MoneyHelper are available to anyone over 50. Citizens Advice at citizensadvice.org.uk provides free guidance for anyone at any stage. The people genuinely at risk of the outcome this research describes often don't know where to start. Knowing the resources exist is useful.
Tony writes about his personal journey to early retirement at freebefore65.co.uk. He is not a financial adviser. All content reflects his own experience and research and should be taken as a starting point for your own thinking, not as professional advice. Always take regulated independent advice before making pension transfer or draw-down decisions.
Add comment
Comments